Brightcove, the Web video distribution platform used by media companies including Dow Jones, Warner Music, and the New York Times, is getting a massive makeover. Most people won’t see it, but its customers will. A new version of the Web-based software that they use to upload, manage, and distribute their videos is rolling out soon. It will be called Brightcove 3. (For more background, read the preview of the Brightcove 3 beta we wrote last june, and our interview with Brightcove CEO Jeremy Allaire in August).
Back in June, we noted:
The new publishing model centers around Brightcove’s first server-side API, which allows publishers to deeply integrate video meta data into their display pages. Publishers can choose to highlight related videos in ways that make the most sense for their content (perhaps by organizing them into lists that can be browsed by topics or names). They can also display descriptions, and choose URLs, that optimize SEO. As far as monetization is concerned, in-page advertisements can be synchronized with in-video ads to make for more effective impressions.
. . . Brightcove 3 has been blessed with a new user interface that doesn’t require publishers to skip around between tabs to address different parts of the setup process. An iTunes-looking control panel takes advantage of drag-n-drop and batch editing capabilities, which should streamline the addition and editing of videos.
Yesterday, we received the leaked screenshots below, and paired them with the corresponding current sections of the Web software. As far as we know, they’ve never been seen before outside the private beta. Judging by the screenshots, Brightcove 3 is much more visual, intuitive, and offers Web video publishers a ton more options than before. Click on each screenshot for a larger image.
Here is the new start page (top) versus the current dashboard (bottom):
Brightcove lets customers customize their video players. Here is the new video player styling editor (top) versus the current one (bottom):
Here is the new title editor (top) versus the current one (bottom). Notice how the ability to add tags and pick video stills and thumbnails is put right up front:
The advertising options are also being expanded. Brightcove 3 (top) looks like it will have options for different ad policies and ad types (pre-roll, mid-roll, post-roll) per player. Currently (bottom), users can pick “advertising” or “no advertising”:
And, I think this might be new, Brightcove 3 will create “multiple renditions” of each video in different standards (VP6 and H.264) and different bit rates (360, 512, 900, and 1,500 kbps), depending, presumably, on the viewer’s bandwidth and software:
Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0
Related posts:
- Two Months After Release, Brightcove Announces Nearly 100 API Partners Web video platform Brightcove has so many API partners...
- Leaked MySpace Music Screenshots MySpace Music, the joint venture between MySpace and the big...
- Brightcove 3: Released and Reviewed Today marks the announcement and release of Brightcove’s Platform 3,...
- Brightcove upgrades video platform (CNET) CNET - Brightcove, the maker of online-video tools, released its...
- New Beta Version Of m.yahoo.com In The Works - We’ve Got Screenshots Further proving that security through (very, very light) obscurity...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.



























1 Users Response In This Post
Comment RSS | Trackback URI
I used Brightcove at my last job. Their UI for embarrassing and painful. These screenshots are a big improvement, but for my money Delve Networks (what I use now - http://www.delvenetworks.com) still has the best UI and overall platform out there.
If you are evaluating video platforms you need ask the following questions:
Why was Delve able build a better product with 20 people in one year with $6m in venture capital, when Brightcove has not updated their product in 2 years and have raised $91m and have ~180 people?
Who do you want to bet on? Brightcove seems arrogant and bloated like Microsoft, and Delve seems smart, nimble, and fast like Google.
Related Articles
Leave Your Reply Here